Summary of 2013 Opinions
DISCLAIMER: The information provided below is intended for educational purposes and in no way replaces the opinions themselves. The information below may not be relied on or otherwise cited in legal proceedings. If information in the summary conflicts with the actual opinion in any way, please notify the Supreme Court Law Clerk.
Wauneka et al v. Yazzie et al, SC-CV-64-12 (Jan 4, 2013 recon. den. Feb 22, 2013)
ELECTION LAW CONFLICTING STATUTES SCHOOL BOARD FORFEITURE In this appeal, the Supreme Court reverses an OHA decision which reversed the Navajo Election Administration's forfeiture and declaration of vacancy of Appellantts' positions as school board members pursuant to 11 N.N.C. § 142(A) after they had missed three consecutive school board meetings. The Court determined that a quorem is not required to invoke forfeiture under Section 142(A) nor can automatic forfeiture be stayed, since Section 142(A) requires forfeiture "by operation of law." Additionally, the OHA may not delay a decision in an election grievance beyond the statutory timelines. |
|
Sandoval v. NEA, No. SC-CV-62-12 (Feb 26, 2013)
ELECTION LAW LEGISLATION AFFECTING CANDIDACY PRESUMPTIONS AFFIRMATIVE DUTY OF NATAANIIS The Supreme Court issues its opinion on reconsideration in this appeal of an OHA dismissal on an election grievance. The Court reverses the OHA and orders Leo Johnson disqualified as school board member of the Shiprock Associated Schools Inc. (SASI). The Court emphasizes the duties of the NEA and candidates when conditions concerning qualifications change before an election has taken place. The Court states that the qualifications statute for school board members specifically require mandatory enforcement throughout the term of office. The vacancy shall be filled by special election pursuant to 11 N.N.C. § 143. |
|
Neptune Leasing v. Mountain States et al, SC-CV-24-10 (May 13, 2013)
JURISDICTION OVER NON-MEMBERS BUSINESS SITE LEASES CONCLUSORY FINDINGS The Supreme Court issues its opinion in this appeal of the Shiprock Court's dismissal of a repossession action on the basis of a lack of personal jurisdiction over Mountain States. The Court reverses and remands for further proceedings. The action concerns the sale and re-sale of a helium plant and its assets located on a Navajo Nation business site leasehold performed without involvement or consent of the Navajo Nation and without even a written business site lease. |
|
Haungooah v. Greyeyes, No. SC-CV-06-13 (June 4, 2013)
HABEAS DUTY TO ASSIST PROBATIONER IN DIRE CIRCUMSTANCES DUE PROCESS The Supreme Court issues its opinion regarding a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by a homeless non-Navajo Indian who had been arrested on a bench warrant without first being served with a probation revocation petition, then ordered to be incarcerated after his probation was revoked. The probationer had earlier called in to his probation officer informing him that he was homeless and needed to leave the vicinity in order to find shelter. Having previously granted the writ and ordered the probationer's release, the Court found that a revocation petition must be served unless the Court determines that probable cause exists to show that attempts at service would be futile due to disappearance without contact and other egregious circumstances. Additionally, Diné bi beenahaz’áanii requires that in our restorative justice system, help should be given to a defendant when dire circumstances are known. Finally, the Court emphasized the due process right to counsel. |
|